freeism.org - diagrams - evolution archetypes

evolution archetypes: forms seven year cycle sublevels

Sublevels of evolution

So, when evolving to a higher level, you have to pass through sublevels in order to complete the level. In fact you may not notice these sublevels unless you are specifically looking for them. But if there was a blockage in your evolution, or something going wrong, identifying which sublevel you were at... might be a good place to finding a way to unblock it.

Each sublevel is a "reflection" of a previous level. As far as I understand it (my understanding may not be perfect yet)... it works like this:

1~1
2~1, 2~2
3~1, 3~2, 3~3
4~1, 4~2, 4~3, 4~4

etc etc. All the way up to 12~12! When you reach the top of one level, like 2~2... or 3~3, then you've basically completed that level. Completing level 3~3 means you've completed the 3rd level. But if you only completed level 3~2, then you've only completed 2/3rds of the 3rd level of evolution.

Given the triangle number equation, we can calculate that there are 78 sublevels in total. ( (N + N^2)/2=X, where N=12 )

As you can see the first level has no real sublevel... It IS it's only sublevel... so the word "sublevel" isn't very meaningful there.

Sublevels apply to biological as well as personal evolution! So... because personal evolution comes in a 7 year cycle, you could identify where you could or should be in your "sublevels"... using your age.

The reason these "sublevels" exist... as far as I understand it, is "evolutionary feedback". Basically, each higher level, must "feed back" into the lower levels, or else it CANNOT BE COMPLETED.

It must strengthen or at least not weaken them! Something that often happens when evolving a higher level is the higher level interferes with the functioning of the lower levels. So the higher level must be tested against each previous level, one at a time, in order to progress in evolution.

If a higher level damages a lower level, it's evolution gets stuck. In fact if it remains stuck and consuming the lower levels, I would imagine the dysfunctioning higher level would be "cut off".

An example in terms of personal evolution, might be someone who evolved to the 4th level, but his inventions took so much time away from him and killed off his sense of spontaneity and fun and youth. So his 4th level was intefering with his 1st level (life itself).

Then he couldn't complete the 4th level and be as good as inventor as he could be, unless he figures out a way to invent things that actually HELP his ability to be young and fun and alive! Once he does invent these things and invents things to keep himself young and alive, and express the kind of fun he had as a child... this would improve his ability to invent. This goes against modern business culture which says you have to give up youth and fun to be a successful person in life, but what do they know anyhow? Besides, many geniuses have said how it's important to think and feel like a child ;)

Anyhow, so that's how it works!

What about biological evolution? Well... this would be something that happens over thousands or millions of years... so it's not something I really can talk about.

But you know, evolution is about information. And culture and society is based on information. So actually human society itself also evolves.

As you know, humans are consuming this world... they are consuming the "lower levels". The plants, and animals. They don't "Feed back" into nature. Humans don't make nature a more beautiful and abundant place than how it existed before humans "arrived". Instead they destroy the beauty and consume everything.

So... in this sense, you can see that human culture cannot complete it's evolution as long as we destroy our own planet. We'll be stuck until we learn how to actually make the rest of nature happier that we exist than had we not existed.

Animals actually make the "plant kingdom" a better place than had they not existed. While it is true that animals do eat plants and I suppose not many plants are happy about being eaten... animals also help plants by spreading their seeds and pollen around. Evolution and healthy reproduction, is hugely important to all life, so in a sense, the "cost" that animals take by eating plants, is outweighed by the benefit of helping their reproduction.

Now... I don't think animals came to this mutually beneficial arrangement with plants on purpose. For example, it does often happen when a foreign animal species is introduced into an area, that the local plant life suffers. It's not like the animals are so freaking clever. It's just evolution of a ecological system. When an animal destroys or weakens an ecosystem, it too suffers along with the rest of the ecosystem. A neighbouring ecosystem may infact... grow.

The animals and plants in a "competing ecosystem" with different predators who kill the animals that are overeating in their local ecosystem, and different plants that help keep the foodchain up to those predators alive... may grow to take over the ecosystem that's been weakened by an animal that's consuming too much.

So in a sense... the ecosystems themselves have their own "evolution", almost like an animal or creature does. Two ecosystems may compete or cooperate... And as one foreign invador enters an ecosystem and weakens it, another ecosystem gets a chance to grow larger and may have it's own predators that stop that animal from invading.

So anyhow, the point is that it's not so hard for animals to be mutually beneficial to plants. So if animals can do it, why can't humans, if we are so clever?

Well, we can. But not as we are today. Today our soceities are based on lies and a decision that it's better to die fighting for your lies than giving up those lies and doing the right thing.

I guess the problem is a combination of the cruel spirit that most life on Earth has, and of the 3rd level of evolution.

If beings that did NOT have sadism in their soul got to the 3rd level of evolution, they would evolve just fine in cooperation with the lower levels.

If beings that did have sadism in their spirit... was only on the 1st or 2nd level of evolution, like Earth plants and animals, they would evolve just fine too.

Beings with no sadism on the 1st or 2nd levels, again that's fine.

But a combination of 3rd level beings with sadism and no true-care... basically your typical human, that just seems to create a total mess. An explosion of evil and lies. The "restraining force" of nature... which is basically death, was sidestepped by humanity, as we learnt how to dominate ecosystems, and invent tools that we used for evil.

In fact humans did the opposite of what nature does, they tried to kill people who stood up for the truth and rejected their lies! Well, not all the time, but some of the time they did. Killing or harming people for speaking the truth only deepens their broken evolution, because then they are killing off the only thing that could fix them.

Once this force (natural selection, or death) that restrained the sadism inherant in most life on Earth (plants animals and humans) was sidestepped... well... then that sadism is more free to act and basically fuck everything up.

I guess the only solution would be for that force to come back again. Either humans consume so much and then most of them die as they destroy the planet's ecosystems beyond repair (not repaired within their lifetimes anyhow)... or something else that means those people who would rather die than stop lying... actually start dying for once. I can't see what that would be though...

Then we'll see humanity becoming in tune with nature again.

One possibility could be if humans remained full of lies, and developed some kind of "warp portal" technology that allowed them to simply "walk" to another planet through this "warp portal" (or "stargate"). And intended to migrate there to consume the life there, and ease the burden on Earth.

What would happen is the aliens watching this would see that humanity has progressed from being a cancer on their own planet, to being an infection. If someone has cancer, it's not within your right to force them to be treated. So if Earth has cancer (humanity), it's not within the alien's right to cleanse Earth of humanity. But once the cancer becomes an infection, everything changes. If someone has an infectious disease, it's quite within your right to force them to be treated if you seriously consider that you are at threat. In that case... humans leaving Earth and exporting our cancerous mindset of consumption and reproduction... would be the final step before aliens would be forced to come here and kill the disease from where it starts.

/diagrams/

–––––

Last modified: Saturday 14/11/2009 15:24

home diagrams/ evolution/ video/ forum